BUSINESS SIGNALS

What You Can Expect
with Qostix Signals

See the change. Understand the evidence. Choose your next step.

Interactive product concept · sample data · monitoring and feature availability require verification.

Get clarity from every important change.

Bring spending, supplier movements and unusual activity into one view. Compare the numbers, follow the explanation and decide what deserves attention—before changing anything.

SELECTED EXAMPLE

Supplier unit price increased

Northline Packaging · shipping cartons

Medium severityNew
Category movement
+5.7%
Detected
Sep 18, 2026
Click a category in the bars, doughnut, legend or table. The report, evidence and explanation stay in sync.
Follow this signal

Monthly Operating Expense Variance Analysis

Aug 2026 to Sep 2026 · Example workspace · Sample data · USD · no live source

4 of 5 example changes meet the relevance threshold.Absolute change: increases and reductions. All rows remain visible; sample review statuses are unchanged.

Cost comparison & variance

PreviousCurrentVariance %
Five category costs; both cost bars start at zero. Percentage variance uses the right-hand axis from minus 10% to plus 100%.USDVariance %01,7503,5005,2507,000−10%0%25%50%75%100%PackagingPack.SoftwareSoft.ServicesSvc.CloudCloudOfficeOffice

Select a bar pair or a table category. Exact values are below.

Current cost by category

Current cost shares; select a segment to update the comments. Exact percentages are also in the legend.Packaging: 47.7%Software: 8.4%Services: 17%Cloud: 6.4%Office: 20.6%47.7%Packaging

Share of all five current example costs. Not a budget allocation.

Monthly category comparison. Previous: Aug 2026; current: Sep 2026. All values USD; no budget data.
CategoryPreviousAug 2026CurrentSep 2026DifferenceVariance
$6,360$6,720+$360+5.7%Meets threshold
$1,000$1,180+$180+18%Meets threshold
$1,200$2,400+$1,200+100%Meets threshold
$1,000$900−$100−10%Meets threshold
$2,800$2,900+$100+3.6%Below threshold
Total$12,360$14,100+$1,740+14.1%

Threshold flags are review prompts, not confirmed issues or savings. Select any category to review its explanation.

Comments

Packaging

New · Medium

+$360 (+5.7%)Observed monthly cost difference

The unit-price increase exceeds an illustrative 5% review threshold. The item and monthly volume are comparable.

Potential impact. $360 / month additional cost at 2,400 cartons; $4,320 annualised only if price and volume persist. Not guaranteed savings.

Human approval. An authorised reviewer must approve any supplier, purchasing or payment change. Nothing is executed here.

Source evidence & next review

Aug 2026 to Sep 2026: $2.65 to $2.80 (USD / carton). Detected Sep 18, 2026.

  • SAMPLE-NP-AUG-01Aug 2026 invoice line: 2,400 shipping cartons × $2.65 = $6,360.
  • SAMPLE-NP-SEP-01Sep 2026 invoice line: the same 2,400 cartons × $2.80 = $6,720.
  • SAMPLE-NP-CHECK-01Matched item and volume; the agreed rate still needs verification.

Next review. Check the agreed rate and ask the supplier to explain the change before considering any adjustment.

ONE SIGNAL. THE COMPLETE PICTURE.

From a change to a considered decision.

Follow each step, or play one short explanation. Nothing here executes a business action.

Automatic walkthrough follows your motion preferences. Use the step buttons or Next step to explore manually.

STEP 1 OF 6 · CONNECT

Start with comparable source information.

A useful signal begins with the right records, periods and scope. This interactive example uses fixed sample records—not a live connection or continuous monitoring service.

Affected subject
Northline Packaging · shipping cartons
Source evidence
3 fixed sample records
Detected in example
Sep 18, 2026
Report view
Aug → Sep 2026 · monthly sample

Supporting sample evidence

Packaging · Aug 2026 / Sep 2026
  • SAMPLE-NP-AUG-01

    Aug 2026 invoice line: 2,400 shipping cartons × $2.65 = $6,360.

  • SAMPLE-NP-SEP-01

    Sep 2026 invoice line: the same 2,400 cartons × $2.80 = $6,720.

  • SAMPLE-NP-CHECK-01

    Matched item and volume; the agreed rate still needs verification.

Fixed sample records, not a live integration. Comparability, source freshness and business authority still need verification.

Read the complete explanation without playing the walkthrough

1. Connect — Start with comparable source information.

A useful signal begins with the right records, periods and scope. This interactive example uses fixed sample records—not a live connection or continuous monitoring service.

2. Detect — Bring this change into focus.

This example meets the selected ±5% magnitude review threshold. Thresholds help prioritise a review; they do not prove waste, duplicate payment or a business risk. Both rises and reductions can deserve investigation.

3. Explain — Follow the numbers back to the evidence.

The unit-price increase exceeds an illustrative 5% review threshold. The item and monthly volume are comparable.

4. Recommend — Choose a practical, evidence-backed next step.

Check the agreed rate and ask the supplier to explain the change before considering any adjustment.

5. Human review — Keep the consequential decision with an authorised person.

Review the explanation and relevant records before approving a next step. Try the local review simulation below: it changes this example's visible state only, not your business systems.

6. Measure — Measure an outcome—not an assumption.

An approved recommendation is not a realised saving. An outcome needs a comparable baseline, a completed action, an agreed measurement period and supporting records. This sample does not establish customer savings or performance caused by Qostix.

Signals prompt investigation, not automatic financial decisions. Qostix AI and operational monitoring are intended capabilities; confirm their availability, data connections, permissions and cadence in your demo.

Book a demo
YOUR NEXT CLEAR STEP

Less guesswork.
More business clarity.

Let’s explore what connected intelligence could mean for your business.

Book a demoA conversation about your business. Not a generic pitch.